By Michelle Richardson
Dance themed reality television has proven to attract a large viewership. In 2008, So You Think You Can Dance (SYTYCD) Australia’s first auditions, finale night and winner announcement episodes were all within Australia’s top watched programs for the year (Screen Australia, 2008). These viewership numbers show that dance themed reality television transcends past that of just dancers and is enjoyable to the general public. This post seeks to discuss some of the different explanations of this popularity and of other reality television dance phenomena such as Dancing With The Stars (DWTS) and Dance Moms. Explanations for the popularity of such reality shows will be demonstrated in this paper through their abilities to encourage social cultural activity, its suitability to the modern audience, its ‘family friendly’ nature, and their highlighting of dance as being widely accessible. Additionally, it will also discuss that while dance reality television is created with entertainment in mind, the focus on pulling in mass audience results in less authentic displays and depictions of the presented dance style. To support these cases, I will draw from the work of Bonner (2013), Broomfield (2011), Cardinal (2013) and McMains (2010) as well as my own experiences of commercial dance forms and my own television viewing.
One vital element of reality television dance shows is
their competitive narrative. The popularity of shows such as SYTYCD and DWTS
could be due to their competition narrative as it promotes social cultural
activity among its audience, whether this is within real life situations or throughout
digital platforms. In SYTYCD, the judges provide criticism on highly athletic
and experienced dancers, but the overall decision of who leaves each week comes
down to public vote until one dancer wins the title of SYTYCD. In contrast, DWTS
involved celebrities with little to no dance experience being partnered with a
professional dancer. The judges scoring on an episode is converted into a
percentage and then is combined with the percentage of votes received by each
contestant. The contestant couple with the lowest combined score is then
eliminated from the competition (ABC,2017).
A part of the show’s experience
for an audience is to be up to date with who was voted off, what were the best
performances of the night and to theorise with others who will be voted off
next and who will win the competition (Bonner, 2013). Missing an episode results
in losing a full understanding of the competition’s long running narrative. The
drama behind a “shock elimination” has no weight for an audience member who has
missed previous performances. This fear of missing out was reflected in my own
experiences watching SYTYCD. During the peak of SYTYCD, I was in high school
and often felt this pressure to be up to date with episodes, so I was able to
discuss them in school with my friends the next day. Staying up to date and
discussing the competition details of SYTYCD with my friends enabled a sense of
belonging to something important and enforced our friendship through another
common interest. While these shows are entertaining, many audience members
might fear social isolation if they do not up to date with their peers,
boosting the show’s ratings and popularity as a result.
This fear of social isolation is also a well-documented
social cultural effect online. McMains (2010) notes that these dance themed
reality television shows are formatted to suit the attention span of the modern
population of television ‘screen jugglers’. The term screen juggling, or
sometimes media multitasking describes when an audience member multitasks with
a second screen device such as a smartphone or laptop computer while
simultaneously viewing a television broadcast (Ainasoja
et.al, 2014). Further, in a study by Ainasoja et.al (2014), it was found
that the primary use of this second screen in the viewing experience depends on
the individual but noted its popularity for social aspects and commenting. They
conclude that the combination of the two screens can strengthen social ties in
a group setting or if alone to avoid the feeling of watching alone. Many
television shows including DWTS in the US are beginning to utilise the
popularity of screen juggling. For the first time in 2018, DWTS is
incorporating live viewer voting, further emphasising audience connectivity
(Barton, 2018). This two-screen juggling is also often reflected in my
own television viewing. I still remember discussing SYTYCD online with friends,
during the “lulls” of the show instead of focusing on the full show. Evidence
of this is still shown online through hashtags such as #sytycd or #dwts on
Twitter, Facebook and Instagram, particularly when these hashtags appear as
people are watching the show. While this is an avenue for fans to discuss the
show, it also acts for advertising to promote to a wider audience, further
helping their overall popularity.
Added to this competitive narrative, dance themed reality
television often have special cross over, promotional events or season themes. For
their thirteenth season, in 2016 SYTYCD focused their attention away from adult
contestants and instead auditioned young dancers ages eight to thirteen. To
promote this season the star of Dance Moms, Maddie Ziegler joined the U.S
edition of SYTYCD as a season judge (Connolly, 2016). Maddie herself had a
large fan following, as she got her start at age eight dancing on Dance Moms and
then later in music videos for the music artist Sia. Promotional moves such as
incorporating Ziegler as a season long host, would promote viewership among the
younger fans of Ziegler and Dance Moms. Many of these fans have proven to
already enjoy dance related media and were perhaps too young for the shows
initial premiere. Similarly, the 2018
U.S season of DWTS is incorporating an all athlete contestants such as Olympic
figure skater Tonya Harding and former Los Angeles Lakers superstar Kareem
Abdul-Jabbar (Barton, 2018). These promotional moves
also endorse initial social cultural activity and media coverage, attracting a
new, enthusiastic audience.
Another explanation for the popularity of these dance
themed reality television shows is that they break down any perceived socio-economic
barriers associated with dance and instead promote dance as being diverse and
easily accessible for all. This message of diversity is documented through
these shows’ casts, showcasing dancers from a wide range of ages, genders,
races, ethnicity, abilities and backgrounds (Cardinal, 2013). Short clips of contestants describing their
life difficulties and their passion for dance before performances is common
place on shows such as SYTYCD. Dance Moms showcases dancers as young as eight
who perform technical routines well beyond their years. Such clips demonstrate
the everyday life struggles of contestants and the abilities of such diverse
groups reinforces the idea that anyone can dance. However, McMain (2010) argues that these constants
are carefully picked to be diverse, to enable the audience to imagine
themselves within the contestant role and believe that it is something they can
also do. Growing up with these shows, I always found them as a source of
encouragement and motivation in my own dance pursuits. Showcasing dance as diverse and accessible breaks
away many gender, age, privilege or race barriers set by commercial dance.
Audiences can be united by the shared experience and universal joy of dancing.
While these shows promote social activity and the
accessibility of dance, they also hold on to their popularity by relying on
outdated race and gender stereotypes to remain “non-threating” and family
friendly. Broomfield (2011) discussed how SYTYCD escalates the stigma of
“gayness” in male dance, listing the times in which judges commented on or
questioned the masculinity of their male contestants. While they might be
unaware of this, the SYTYCD judges act as the audience’s key to understanding
dance as a technical artform, and their comments on masculinity reconfirm
dominant gender normalisations without accountability. Again, being a fan of
this show as a teenager I do remember judge Nigel Lythgoe’s fascination and
comments about masculinity and dance. Respecting Lythgoe’s authority in the
dance community and being uneducated about sexuality at that age, I understood
his comments as being a part of legitimate dance critique. As a result, this
influenced how I saw the contestants, as I often overlooked what were
technically advanced routines if they did not conform to this small restriction
of gender. This documents the negative impact these shows can play perpetuate
specific stereotypes, which is common in many popular television shows. This confirmation of stereotypes hopes to
play into a mass audience and retain their popularity, rather than properly
educating their audience on wider issues.
Lastly, the popularity of dance themed reality television
can be explained through the entertainment nature of dance performance and how
it is presented in a television format. Unfortunately, many shows choose to
maximise what is entertaining to a mass audience, rather than showcasing a more
authentic dance experience to a targeted audience. One factor that demonstrates this is the
overreliance these television shows have on controlled poses and high precision
tricks to create excitement and emotional rushes for their audiences. Contestants
are pushed hard to meet these expectations and levels of entertainment, by
being taught choreography and tricks in preference over the true foundations
and technique in the style they are learning (Cardinal, 2013). This “narrow”
depiction of dance can be quite frustrating to those in the audience who study
these dance styles. During the Australian version of DWTS’ peak popularity, I
participated in regular ballroom classes, from the ages of eight to thirteen.
While the show was popular with my friends, I found it to be very frustrating
as the dance styles often didn’t reflect the dance foundations and techniques I
was learning in class. I became further annoyed when such shows demonstrated
lifts and tricks, as these were not allowed during competitions and grading I
participated in. Instead I came to learn that such dance moves were reserved
for more commercial ballroom. While dance themed reality television are
designed to be entertaining to the masses, in my experiences they were
alienating audience members who practiced and understood the more technical
side of dance. I also have experienced the opposite side of this problem,
letting dance themed reality television define my ideas surrounding ballet.
During my independent practice this semester, I constantly found myself
frustrated with how hard ballet is without the formal training. My expectations
had been shaped by contestants on SYTYCD, which learn flashy and elaborate
routines in genres unfamiliar to them within a week. However, contestants who
successfully achieve this often fall back on previous training from similar
styles.This lack of authenticity can similarly be shown in the styles of dance
showcased on SYTYCD. They tend to represent a narrow definition of dance, with
the styles showcased often being popular, front facing and skill-oriented
styles (Cardinal, 2013). While these techniques worked well in a television
format and reinforce the popularity of these shows through excitement these
chosen styles create, this form of dance entertainment creates limitations and
removes authenticity to the variety of styles shown.
To conclude, the popularity of danced themed reality
television such as SYTYCD and DWTS can be explained through the ways in which
their competitive narrative and shared experience of dance unites a mass
audience. The audience evidence of this is well documented online, such as the
#sytycd and #dwts hashtags. However, this popularity can also be shown through
a heavy reliance on outdated stereotypes and entertainment focused
choreography. While the outcomes of this produces an entertaining and family
friendly show enjoyed by the masses, it similarly creates narrowing expectations
of what dance and dancers are.
References
Ainasoja, M., Linna, J., Heikkilä, P., Lammi, H., Oksman,
V. (2014). A case study on understanding 2nd screen
usage during a live broadcast: A qualitative multi-method approach. UBICOMM 2014: The Eighth International Conference on Mobile
Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, Rome, Italy, 24–28 August,
pp. 196–203.
Barton, A. (2018). How to Vote for Dancing with the Stars:
Athletes 2018. Retrieved from http://abc.go.com/shows/dancing-with-the-stars/news/updates/how-to-vote-for-dancing-with-the-stars-athletes-2018
Bonner, F. (2013). Celebrity, work and the reality-talent
show: Strictly Come Dancing / Dancing with the Stars. Celebrity Studies, 4(2),
169-181
Broomfield, M. (2011). Policing Masculinity and Dance
Reality Television: What Gender Nonconformity Can Teach Us in the Classroom.
Journal of Dance Education, 11(4), 124-128.
Cardinal, M. (2013). Deciphering Dance in Reality
Television: The Good, the Questionable, and the Unconscionable. Journal of
Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(1), 7-10.
Connolly, K. (2018). ‘SYTYCD’ Maddie Ziegler joins the
judges in exclusive first look. Retrieved from
http://ew.com/article/2016/07/11/so-you-think-dance-maddie-ziegler-judge/
Dancing with the Stars: Athletes Vote FAQs. (2018).
Retrieved from https://dwtsvote.abc.go.com/#faq
McMains, J. (2010). Reality check: Dancing with the Stars
and the American dream / Juliet McMains (pp. Carter, Alexandria. The Routledge
dance studies reader Ch. 25, p. 261-272). London: Routledge.
Top 20 programs 1998-2009. (2018). Retrieved from
https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/fact-finders/television/industry-trends/in-the-archive/top-programs/top-20-programs-1998-2009